One of the primary reasons for Islam receiving so much negative attention, is through the use of multimedia propaganda news and negative political attention. This causes people to be influenced by the propaganda they hear and read. This can then be the fuel that brainwashes society into believing that Islam is evil and all Muslims are associated with terrorism.


There are two ways in which we receive our news. The first is through traditional media, which is the larger and popular news sites that we often view. The second is through advocacy journalism, which aims to produce truthful information from passionate and accurate activists.

The issue being that, instead of listening to activists who aim to produce truthful information, we often listen to propaganda from the larger traditional news publications.

Instead of publicising breaking news of hundreds of innocent Muslims that have been killed, they would rather publicise one person who was murdered by a “Muslim terrorist”. Usually displaying no real evidence to the terrorist being Muslim, but instead using words like “the gunner was ALEGIBLY believed to be a Muslim terrorist”. This then fuels the amount of negative and untruthful attention that Islam receives, causing the public to have a destructive view on Muslims.


So, what if it was the other way around? What happens when Muslim men, women and children are slaughtered in cold blood? We don’t often see that in the media. But why?

“As the media environment becomes more decentralized and competitive, news outlets may try to maintain market share by devoting more attention to terrorist attacks that employ novel tactics or that are particularly violent” (Walsh 2010).

The popular and larger mainstream media publications would rather publicise “Muslims” killing innocent people in a “terrorist attack”, instead of showing that innocent Muslim women and children are being slaughtered in Syria every week. Unfortunately, the media will devote more attention to the stories that are more popular, rather than the ones more important. That is why it is up to activists to reverse the role and publicise the important information and hidden messages that we’re not exposed to.

“When objective journalism decays into a cowardly neutrality between truth and lies, we need advocacy journalism to lift our profession… back to credibility.”                                                                       (Niles 2011)


We usually view our information in many different ways, from social media channels, multimedia communication publications or from people in positions of power, such as politicians.

However, we don’t truly know which publication we can trust, as we don’t normally know where their facts and evidence have come from. We are so often exposed to news that they can miss a key point or even fail to give us the facts we need to know.

The media can also amplify existing attitudes and opinions with regard to events, beliefs about rights and wrongs, and political leaders or groups” (Gardner, Karakasoglu & Luchtenberg 2008).

We are often exposed to information that they want us to believe, rather than the information we need to believe.


Numerous media campaigns are often displaying negative opinions about Islam. In the media we often hear the words “Allah Akbar” associated with a terrorist attack and we’re easily convinced that these two words is all the evidence we need to blame the situation on Muslims. However, why should these two words mean that the perpetrator is automatically labelled a Muslim terrorist? This is because of certain ‘language’ that is displayed through mass communication and when we hear these words over and over again associated with the words ‘Muslims’, our minds become brainwashed into automatically associating the words “terrorist” and “Muslims” together.

One common quote we often hear in the media is that not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims’. This statement has grabbed the attention of many and although it might be incredibly offensive, the media continues to promote this statement, brainwashing people’s minds into believing this is true. Through this statement, people then have negative thoughts about Muslims and people develop Islamophobia, where any terrorist attack they hear of is immediately linked to Islam.



“Despite the explosion of media coverage and publications on Islam and Muslims, the major challenge today involves getting accurate and verified information” (MEŠIĆ 2011).

The only way we can get this information is from activists who aim to show the truthful message that the popular mainstream media publications won’t. The problem being that “the pressing issue of Islamophobia and the erosion of civil liberty due to excessive linking of terrorism and Islam have somehow not been considered important in the public debates” (Quraiehy & Deltombe 2006).


We don’t often see Muslim and Islam leaders coming out and speaking about how they feel about ISIS and how they feel about being discriminated. This is not because Muslims don’t want to speak up, rather it’s because mainstream media publications are not interested in publicising these messages. An important thing to think about is that nowhere in the Quran (Islam Bible), is there anything that promotes terrorism. Although some terrorists claim to be Muslims, Islam does not support any form of terrorism.


ISIL has been on the rise in recent years, inducing fear into minds on a global scale and causing terror around the world. Mostly done through small operations in a busy destination that will be filmed by many and instantly uploaded onto the internet and broadcasted around the world in minutes.

An example of this is the ‘Sydney Siege’, where one man claiming to be Muslim took hostage the Lindt café across from the channel 7 headquarters in Sydney CBD. This terrorist siege was not about taking control or a café and asking for demands, but rather to publicise terrorism in the perfect location, right across from a multimedia publication.

Weimann (2004) established in their study why the internet is such an ideal platform for terrorist organisations, reasons such as: easy access, little or no regulation, potentially huge audiences, anonymous communication and others. Together these points sum-up why it’s so easy to distribute information and gain copious amounts of attention.

“The rise of ISIS also has coincided with the proliferation of social media as a global means of communication… The result is ISIS’s exploitation of social media to turn unsophisticated attacks into spectacular attacks, not just to spread fear, but also to gain recruits” (Cozine 2016)


The irrational fear of Islam and its followers stems from powerful politician’s propaganda and agenda’s as well as the negative media attention the religion receives. The Oxford Dictionary defines Islamophobia to be the “dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force”.


The University of South Australia conducted interviews which surveyed 100 Australians  and were asked seven questions which would indicate feelings of Islamophobia.  

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.08.03 pm

It is clear that the vast majority of the 100 Australians surveyed didn’t indicate that they were Islamophobic to an extreme, however, it still shows that 19.5% of the people wouldn’t live in a place where there were Muslims and 15.6% were undecided. It also shows that 23.9% of people would support any policy to stop the building of a new mosque and 17.7% of people were undecided. Although these statistics are quite low, it still shows that a few Australians are somewhat Islamophobic 

Islamophobia is not a new concept or ideology, as this prejudice towards Islam has been an ever-growing fire which traditional journalism and political figures have been adding fuel to. However, these media outlets and politicians are basing their perception of the ‘truth’ on events that are happening in our current society to further their political agenda of isolating and eliminating Muslims and their religion.


Traditional media outlets and advocacy journalists are not the only way in which society can receive the ‘truth’ about issues. Powerful political figures, such as the American Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton and also Australian politicians, Pauline Hanson and Sam Dastyari all contribute and influence the ways in which society perceives Muslims and their religion.

Politicians have the ability to persuade and manipulate the views of their followers and also society in general to further their political agenda. Political figures and traditional journalists are similar in they ways in which they tell their version of the ‘truth’. They both perceive an individual Muslim extremists act as an appropriate representation of the entire Islamic religion. Thus, branding all Muslims to be extremists and terrorists. 


Donald Trump is the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States.


It is evident in Trump’s campaign speeches that the number one emotion he wishes to instil into his supporters is fear. Fear is an effective and powerful emotion which can turn rational thinkers into individuals with irrational ideas about certain religious groups or a particular country. Trump advocates the deportation of Muslims from the United States and furthermore keeping out all immigrants wanting to enter the US.

Islam and its followers have constantly been a scapegoat in the past and is continuing to be one to this day. Trump states, “we cannot continue to allow thousand upon thousands of people into our country, many of whom have the same thought process as this savage killer”. 

By constantly assuming that one extremist is an accurate representation of an entire religion can lead society to be governed by bigots with closed minds, which could then possibly be an accurate representation of our society. 


However, Hilary Clinton, the nominee of the Democratic Party promotes that Islam and its followers are not the issue. She is an advocate in this video for Muslims. She asserts that Muslim extremists are the problem, not the entire religion. 


Australian politician Pauline Hanson has her own agenda which matches Donald Trumps. By instilling fear within society, people are drawn to be misinformed and not understand what the religion of Islam actually means. Hanson uses her position of power to alienate Muslims and their beliefs just as journalists use their power to report their version of the ‘truth’.

By taking the Quran passages out of context, Islam becomes susceptible to prejudice from Australian society. By preaching these words of hate, Hanson and other political figures drive a wedge between Muslims and society. 

Social media is an extremely influential platform, where people can share their thoughts, beliefs and ideas to the entire world. Journalists and politicians use this to their advantage, when reporting on issues or giving opinions to further serve their agenda.


Pauline Hanson and numerous other political figures use social media platforms for their own propaganda. Hanson and One Nation have been campaigning against halal certification, claiming that tax/surcharges paid for halal certified food funds terrorism. 

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation policy is simple. Stop Muslim immigration, ban halal certification, to ban the burqa and niquab in public places and many more unreasonable policies to enact. 


Politicians do not need to be truthful, as the only truth they need is the one that will bring them into power. The ‘truth’ and facts can be twisted in any way which will help aid their political campaign. Just as traditional journalists can interpret facts wrong in order to make Muslims look a certain way, in order to brainwash society into thinking that Islam is a problem that needs to be stopped. 

However, Iranian born Sam Dastyari has been a big advocate for Muslims in Australia, thus combatting the prejudice policies that Hanson wants to enact.

Dastyari uses his position of power to assert the truth about Muslims in Australian society and all over the world. Coming from an Islamic background allows Sam to understand and explain the reality of Islam, and not what journalists and bigots say in the media.


It is extremely important that society hears both sides to this anti-Islam debate, so people can make their own unbiased decision. Islam needs positive advocates like Sam Dastyari in order for our society to live cohesively regardless of a person’s religion, political preference or gender and other contributing factors.

There is also a need for advocacy journalists who’s aim it is to report truthful information. However, there will always be biases and unreasonable people in the world and people that will say or do anything which will further their own agenda. But as long as there is someone advocating for the scapegoat which in this case is Islam and its followers, there will be a chance that the real truth will eventually come out.


Cozine k 2016, ‘Social Media and the Globalization of the Sicarii’, Global Security Studies, Vol. 7, no. 1, viewed 26 August 2016, <;

Gardner, R, Karakasoglu, Y & Luchtenberg, S 2008 ‘Islamophobia in the Media a Response from Multicultural Education’, vol. 19, no. 2, viewed 26 August, <;

MEŠIĆ M 2011, ‘The Perception of Islam and Muslims in the Media and the Responsibility of European Muslims towards the Media’, viewed 26 August 2016, <;

Niles R 2011, ‘Why We Need Advocacy Journalism’, The Online Journalism Review, viewed 25 August 2015, <;

Quraiehy, B & Deltombe, T 2006, ‘Islamophobia in the Media’ viewed 27 August 2016, <;

Walsh J I 2010, ‘Causes and Consequences’, Media Attention to Terrorist Attacks, viewed 23 August 2016, <;

Weimann, G 2004, ‘How Modern Terrorism uses the Internet’ Special Report, viewed 23 August 2016, <;


After visiting the doctor and recieving concerning news about his health, Kevin Cartwright decided it was time for a change. In 2011 he took up body building and clean eating to get back into shape and to turn his life around. This sparked a ferocious inferno inside that nothing could extinguish. The gym is now his safe haven, a place where he goes to get into a meditative state. Cartwright’s rapport with the gym has brought to his life health, business opportunities and newly found self- confidence.


Alex: “I’d love to go to New Zuland”- *Insert Kiwi accent*

All young aspiring foreign correspondents are ambitious and hopeful in fulfilling their dreams of reporting overseas. What is it about this particular career that makes it so desirable? Is it the ability to travel, not being tied down to a single location. Or maybe experiencing different culture and traditions present in overseas countries. Or the desire to leave young Australia in the hopes of exploring an older, more historic country. It could also be to bring to light the issues in other countries which are not reported or prioritised here in Australia, where national news dominates.

It is all well and good to be hopeful and to be ambitious, but there are quite a few issues encountered in Journalism. The main issue seems to be reporting in war zones and putting ones life at risk in order to get a story. “A lot of journalists are harmed and killed when they report on dangerous issues” aspiring foreign war correspondent Josh Makhoul states. A risk Makhoul is willing to take by putting himself in the frontline to report issues happening in war torn countries. “Its a risk you’ve got to take to get the reward, and the reward is a good story that is important and relevant to society”“We are not trained soldiers” aspiring travel foreign correspondent Sarah Leong commented. This issue can be combatted by second source journalism, getting the information need from people that are actually on the frontline or people from the war torn country.

However, not all issues are life threatening. Competition in journalism is at an all time high. Leong who is interested in travel but also more serious issues such as war, points out the main issue in the competition overseas “Not being able to compete with the national journalists of that country… they will get priority and privileges over you”. When reporting in other countries a journalist must be well researched and prepared, “If you can’t speak the language that would kind of suck “.”There is always an influx of new kids wavin’ their degrees in your face” Walsh states. There is a lot of people that want to do journalism but not enough jobs to support that. Brock is interested in reporting absolutely anything overseas that has nothing to do with “That royal baby shit”. He is keen to travel and see the world as he can not see himself sitting behind a desk. “International news isn’t well represented in Australia, I think I could change that”. He believes that there is a lot more relevant news happening outside of Australia that isn’t making its way through mainstream media.

Aspiring war, fashion and lifestyle foreign correspondent Alex Stefanovic comments that the biggest issue in journalism would have to be sexism. “Regardless of what form of journalism it is, there is still sexism present” It is seen that there is more of a focus on what women are wearing and how they look rather than what they are reporting. “Karl Stefanovic did an experiment and wore the same suit everyday for a year and no one noticed. If Lisa Wilkinson did that it would be a different story”. It is a difficult issue to over come, “People just need to be more open minded”.

Alex pointing out where she wants her job to lead her

Alex pointing out where she wants her job to lead her


From a very young age playing soccer was all I really wanted to do.

“From a very young age playing soccer was all I really wanted to do”

Typically a 16 year old club football player doesn’t usually become an international football player that often. 19 year old Bachelor of Commerce and International Studies student Lukas Stergiou started playing at the age of 5 for his local Wollongong United club. “I was around 16 when i was scouted”. The day seemed to be normal as he travelled to Sydney for his usual training session. “When I got there my coach had brought over an agent from Europe who was interested in taking me overseas and wanted to represent me”. Stergiou was taken to London and lived there for 7 months, playing for Tottenham Hotspurs and Charlton Athletic youth teams.

Not having to sit behind a desk for 6 hours a day at school and being able to play professional football would be every boys dream at 16. Lukas never actually dropped out of school completely, and whilst overseas continued to try and keep up with the school work. “It was hard at times. I found myself dropping behind and found it even more difficult to learn new topics as I was always leaving the country for another trip overseas every few weeks”. But in the end he was doing what he loved at the time and making the most of every opportunity that was given to him.

The experience gave Lukas endless opportunities which included being exposed to the international level of football which gave him the best possible opportunity to succeed. By playing in England, Stergiou was noticed by other coaches back in Australia. One of them being the Australian U17’s coach, who got in contact with him and from there he earned a place in the U17’s Australian team representing Australia in the Asia Cup Qualifiers, the Asia Cup and World Cup Qualifiers.

Playing on an international level for the U17’s Australian football team lead Lukas to travelling the world at an early age. The countries that he has been to due to soccer alone are England, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Laos, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Bolivia. England has been stated as one of his favourite places he has been. “It has the best competition of soccer in the world. The atmosphere at the games and the style of play. Everything about it appeals to me, it’s something special and memorable”.

Being able to travel the world was but one of the privileges given to the young player but also the entire experience has enabled him to interact with different cultures and religions. It has allowed Lukas to enhance his communication and time management skills, his maturity and ability to work in a group but most importantly “My experiences gave me independence”.

Stergiou then had to make a difficult decision, whether to continue playing soccer in hopes of becoming a successful international football player or to come home and finish school. “I started to think of the long term and essentially what would be more realistic. I came to the conclusion that soccer being such an unpredictable or uncertain career that I would need a back up plan”. A career in soccer only lasts until their mid 30’s plus being susceptible to injuries its really a game of chance. “I didn’t want to sacrifice everything on the slim chance that everything would work out”. 


Freedom of speech is a right we like to exercise in Australia. We are free to speak our mind and express thoughts and opinions. However, in regards to the media, are we as journalists free to say what we truly think? Are there laws which govern what can be printed and broadcasted? Who monitors and regulates these opinions? In the end, do we really have freedom of expression?

Sports reporter Scott McIntyre was fired from SBS after posting the following tweet:

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 8.57.24 pm

According to Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson, McIntyre wasn’t censored as his tweets didn’t break any laws. We are allowed to express social and political views either on air or through social media, no matter how radical those views might be. However, if expression is discriminatory in any way either defaming colour, ethnicity and religion, employers can take action.

So what was the reason as to why he was fired? The Rule of Law requires freedom of speech and the media. McIntyre was merely stating his political opinion over his social media, in no way was he discriminatory in any fashion. However when expressing one’s opinion it must be exercised with respect for others. SBS clearly didn’t want a tarnished name or reputation and took action towards this extreme view on the ANZAC’s.

In Australia freedom of speech has no constitutional protection. The Institute of Public Affairs believes our freedom of speech is in jeopardy. New ‘rights’ are being introduced such as “the right not to be offended” are undermining the right to freedom of expression. As a journalist, the job is to voice opposing views either criticising or justifying. These new rights are essentially regulating what the media is posting as governments are seemingly unhappy with the political criticism coming from an apparent ‘hostile’ media.


Journalism appears to be a male dominant career in newsrooms and print around the world today. Sexism is running rampant throughout journalism. Journalism is an industry which reports on the inequalities in other workplaces, yet rejects to report on the enormous gender gap within it’s own.

The Status of Women in the U.S. Media 2014 chart shows that overall men dominate the media industry at 63.4% while women only represent 36.1%. It is evident in the media today that men report on the serious issues such as world politics, business, sports and economics. Whereas women are frequently reporting on lifestyle, health and entertainment.

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 7.36.48 pm

Women are hideously underrepresented in sports journalism.’s article states that out of 183 sports talk radio hosts on Talkers magazine’s “Heavy Hundred,” only two were women. In evening broadcast men dominate at 65% compared to women at 35%. The New York Times has the widest gender gap with 2454 articles published by men while only 1102 published by women.

What has brought this inequality on? However the gender gap isn’t based on reporting issues alone, pay also comes into play. The Australian Bureau of Statistics reports that full-time working women’s earnings are 17.1% less per week than full-time working men’s earnings.

To say that there is an obvious inequality between men and women in the media is accurate. Women are too often harshly judged not on how they do their job or what they are reporting, but on what they wear and how they look.

The Today Show’s news reporter Karl Stefanovic proved this with his experiment. Stefanovic wore the same suit everyday for an entire year and he quotes “No one has noticed; no one gives a shit,”

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 7.29.50 pm

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 7.31.28 pm

However, co-host Lisa Wilkinson is under constant scrutiny for her appearance and what she wears, thus showing the difference between men and women and what they are judged on in the media.


Processed with VSCOcam with a6 preset

Ah the shuttle bus line up, always a favourite past time of mine. The only true way to know that you are a struggling uni student is when you are waiting for that damn bus. What is a better way to make you feel like you are back at school than by being made to form one immaculate straight line? Absolutely nothing. But the line just happens to stretch across the entire university grounds. But lets be real, that’s not the worst part is it? The epitome of struggling at uni life is when people come and push in front of everyone. Uni life is absolutely beautiful when there are people at uni who disregard everyone else. However, there are only a couple of those people. The University of Wollongong is full of friendly and helpful people, with a few exceptions such as the bus line jumpers.